"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." --- The US ConstitutionSo much for that. Apparently keeping and bearing arms can still get you jailed, according to this article.
Go back and read the article. Now that you've read the article you can read this.
Well, if we can trust Mr. Andrews then it appears that not only were his second and possibly fourth amendment rights violated, but he was also held in deplorable conditions more like one would expect to find in a third would dictatorship. Of course, am I surprised? No. Not in the least. DC is on the cutting edge the progressive movement and the thought of violating multiple constitutional rights would only be concerning if the victim is a minority or a loyal democrat. After all, the constitution is a living and breathing document, which means that it can be interpreted however one wants it to be. What the constitution really means is that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed unless the cops feel like doing so. When the Constitution said unalienable rights it didn't mean that they shouldn't be stomped over whenever the government sees fit, they just thought that they might make a good place to start from and certainly didn't intend for them to be used to stop progress. And even if they did, who are they to tell us that we can't live in a nation where people exist to serve the government and where we have no real freedom whatsoever.
No comments:
Post a Comment