Well, looky here! Someone else agrees with me. And he even knows something about science. Yes, thats right, for the first time since I finished my english class assignment, I am posting on the global scam of global warming. Turns out, not only does David Evens know something about science, he knows a lot. According to the websight:
David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modelling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. He is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees, including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering.
Although I won't go deep into what he says here (you can just read the article) his basic argument is that, counter to the global warming climate models, the earth has a negative feedback system rather than a positive feedback system. In other words, the earth counters unbalances, containing their affect, rather than increasing them. When you think about it, this makes a lot of sense. After all, if, as some suggest, the slightest bit of warming caused more warming, and so on and so forth, the earth would have burnt to a crisp billions of years ago. Furthermore, the people who claim there is a positive feedback system predict that the increase in Carbon Dioxide will cause the layer of water vapour in the atmosphere to increase. This has not been the case, according to the thousands of weather balloons that have been floating up into the very edges of the atmosphere for decades. So far this explanation is turning out pretty poorly, so please go read the article.
David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modelling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. He is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees, including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering.
Although I won't go deep into what he says here (you can just read the article) his basic argument is that, counter to the global warming climate models, the earth has a negative feedback system rather than a positive feedback system. In other words, the earth counters unbalances, containing their affect, rather than increasing them. When you think about it, this makes a lot of sense. After all, if, as some suggest, the slightest bit of warming caused more warming, and so on and so forth, the earth would have burnt to a crisp billions of years ago. Furthermore, the people who claim there is a positive feedback system predict that the increase in Carbon Dioxide will cause the layer of water vapour in the atmosphere to increase. This has not been the case, according to the thousands of weather balloons that have been floating up into the very edges of the atmosphere for decades. So far this explanation is turning out pretty poorly, so please go read the article.
No comments:
Post a Comment